The Displaying of Supposed Witchcraft, chapter 6: That divers places in Scripture have been mis-translated thereby to uphold this… (part 1 of 5)

CHAP. VI. That divers places in Scripture have been mis-translated thereby to uphold this horrid Opinion of the Devils Omnipotency, and the Power of Witches, when there is not one word that signifieth a familiar Spirit or a Witch in that sense that is vulgarly intended.

COncerning the words in the Hebrew and Greek, that are commonly alledged to prove these things, they have been wrested and drawn to uphold these Tenents by those Translators that had imbibed these Opinions, and so instead of following the true and genuine signification of the words, they haled them to make good a pre-conceived Opinion, and did not simply and plainly render them as they ought to have been. Which hath been observed by divers, especially by Wierus, who got the learned Masius (a great Hebrician) to interpret them, of which he hath given a full account, which was followed by Mr. Scot. As also Mr. Ady, who hath perfectly rendred them according to the Translation of Junius and Tremellius, and likewise Mr. Wagstaff hath prettily opened the most of them. So that our attempt here might seem to be superfluous and unnecessary, and may be condemned of arrogance and vain confidence. To which we reply, That it is far from us to compare our selves with those Learned men that were Masters of the Hebrew and Greek Tongues, being in comparison but a Smatterer in those Languagues, yet have in our younger years both studied and taught them to others, and as far as we undertake, we hope we need not fear the censure of the most rigid Critick; intending to note some things that others have omitted, and to handle them to the full, which others have but done briefly. And this we shall prosecute in this order.

1. We shall take the words in the same order as they are recited in Deuteronomy, and the first mentioned is in these words: There shall not be found among you that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire. Now here we shall not enter upon that great Dispute, whether they really burned and sacrificed by burning their children unto Moloch, or that they only dedicated them to that Idol, by making them pass through the fire; but examine the reasons, why those that practised this kind of Idolatry are ranked amongst the Diviners or Witches, and were to have the same punishment, seeing it is no where mentioned, that these used any kind of Divination at all, and these we conceive to be the chief.

1. The Lord had promised his People to raise them up a Prophet from amongst their Brethren like unto Moses, and that therefore they should hear him, and not go after other Gods or Idols. And therefore he sent them many and divers Prophets, of whom they were to inquire: so likewise they gave the Priest order to inquire by Urim and Thummim, by which he gave answers, and therefore they were to hearken to his Ordinances, and not to follow after other strange Gods: For the Nations that he cast out had hearkened unto Observers of times and Diviners, but they were not to do so. And though these that caused their children to pass through the fire unto Moloch, used not Divinations, yet it was a wicked and abominable Ceremony, and the use and end of it to lead the people to Idolatry, and therefore is reckoned amongst the rest.

2. They are solely condemned, because the end of all their Divinations and their other Feats, were only to draw and lead the people to Idolatry, and to serve other Gods. For it is manifest, that all ways and sorts of Divination were not in themselves evil and unlawful, for else Astronomy it self, that foretels the Entrance of the Sun and Moon into such Signs, and when Eclipses will happen, and the like, should be forbidden too, but they were not: so that the chief reason why they were condemned, was sub ratione finis, non medii, in regard of the end, and not of the means used, because all their Divinations, and other Arts, Crafts, or Feats, whether performed by natural or artificial means, or otherwise, had still for their chief and principal end the leading of the people unto Idolatry, and the serving of other Gods, which was above all things abominable and hateful unto God, who is a jealous God, and will not give his glory to graven Images. And therefore all Idol-Priests, or those that lead the people to Idolatry, are in the Scripture-sense Witches, Diviners, and the like. And that all Divinations were not forbidden, is most clear from that of Solomon, as Arias Montanus translates it: Divinatio super labiis regis: and that of Isaiah, where the Lord threatneth to take away the staff and stay of Jerusalem, that is, the mighty man, and the man of war, the Judge, the Prophet, and the prudent, Divinum, sive Sagacem. For it is the same word, and from the same root [non-Latin script] Divinavit: For as Avenarius, Schindler, and others say, Est verbum medium, nam modò in bonam, modò in malam partem accipitur, of which Tremellius saith this: Sagacitas, id est, consultissima prudentia in rebus dijudicandis, praecavendis, & veluti addivinandis: nam vox Hebraea media est sive anceps, quae non tantùm in malam partem accipitur, sed etiam in bonam. Therefo[…]e was the Law so strict, that if any sacrificed unto any other God, save unto the Lord only, he was utterly to be destroyed, much more those that lead and incited the people to serve and sacrifice unto other strange Gods, were to be rooted out.

2. Is the word we have named before, to wit, [non-Latin script], Kosem Kesamim, Divinans divinationes: which, as we have shewed before, was taken in bonam & malam partem, and is by the Septuagint fitly rendred [non-Latin script], vaticinans vaticinium, and is almost with all Translators rendred in that sense and propriety: so that we need not complain, that it is one of them that is mistranslated; but concerning it, we may note these things.

1. That there were and are almost innumerable ways, whereby men have undertaken to Divine and foretel things to come, some of which were by lawful means and ways, as all prudent, sagacious, and experienced men have done, and may do. Some by vain, trivial, foolish, and groundless ways, as by the flying of birds, their noise and motion, and so of beasts, by casting lots, dice, and the like, which have no causality or efficiency in them at all to declare things to come, but were meerly vain and superstitious, with which the Heathen World doth still abound, and they are not yet totally eradicated from amongst Christians. The most foolish of which was this, That when the Philistins had kept the Ark of the Lord seven months, they called the Priests and the Diviners, to know what to do with it, and they advised them not to send it away empty, but to send five golden Emerods and five golden Mice, and to take a new Cart and two Milch-kine, upon which there had com'd no yoke, and to tye them to the Cart, and to bring their Calves home from them, and to lay the Ark in the Cart, and the Jewels of Gold to be put in a Coffer by, thinking that if they went up towards Beth-shemesh that was the Israelites Coast, that if they did so, then it was he that smote them, otherwise that it was but a chance that happened unto them. And this in respect of the Priests and Diviners was only a casual conjecture at Random, though God in his Providence did order it according to his Divine Wisdom for the best. Like unto this was that mentioned by the Prophet, a Consulter with his staff, as also that of Ezekiel: For the King of Babylon stood at the parting of the way, at the head of the two ways, to use divination: he made his arrows bright, he consulted with images, (Teraphim) he looked in the liver. And besides these there were others that pretended Visions and Revelations from their Gods or Idols; but how far either Idols, or Devils, or their Priests could truly foretel things to come, is very doubtful and hard to determine, of which we shall have occasion to speak hereafter.

2. We are to note, that though there were never so many ways of Divination used, and whether the means used to predict by, were natural or supernatural, lawful or unlawful, frivolous and superstitious, or taken upon sound and rational grounds, yet were they all wicked and abominable, because they were used to withdraw the people from those Ordinances that God had appointed to give answers by, and to lead the people to inquire of vain and lying Idols, and their Priests, and thereby to commit Idolatry; and so whatsoever the means were, the end was wicked and damnable.

3. Moreover, what answers soever the Priests forged and gave (for it is manifest, that the Idols gave none at all; for they had mouths and spake not, ears and heard not, eyes and saw not, feet and walked not, neither was there breath in their nostrils) were nothing but lyes and conjectures of their own devising, and there an Idol in the Hebrew is sometimes styled [Hebrew] nihilum, and therefore saith the Prophet: The Prophets prophesie lyes in my Name, I sent them not, neither have I commanded them. They prophesie unto you a false vision and divination, and a thing of nought, and the deceit of their heart. Unto which the Apostle alludeth, when he saith: We know that an Idol is nothing in the world, and that there is none other God but one. That is, that an Idol taken abstractively, without regard to the matter of which it was made, as gold, silver, stone, wood, or the like, which were natural substances, or respect to the figure or shape which was artificial, and the work of the Work-man, it was plainly nothing, and had no real existence as a God or Idol, but only in the Phantasies and minds of the blinded Worshippers; for it neither could truly foretel, nor act any thing of it self, but all that was done, was the lyes and inventions of the Priests that served them, and got their living by that villanous and lying trade. For God by the mouth of his Prophet doth set down the true difference of the true God, that could infallibly foretel and declare things that were to come, from the false Gods and Idols, and doth challenge them in this manner: Shew the things that are to come hereafter, that we may know that ye are Gods: yea do good or do evil, that we may be dismayed, and behold it together. From whence it is plain, that the only [non-Latin script] to distinguish betwixt the Divinations that are given forth by the Spirit of God in his Prophets or Apostles is, that they are plain, certain, and infallible, and the event never faileth to answer the Prediction, but those that are given forth by Satan and his juggling and lying Ministers, are always ambiguous, doubtful, and perplex, and evermore deceive such as trust in them, as was manifest in Ahab, when all the false Prophets bade him go up to Ramoth Gilead, and prosper, yet there was he slain. And as they never truly foretel things to come, so neither can the Idols do good or evil: all that is, or ever was done, was performed only by the cunning, confederacy, and juggling of the knavish and deceitful Priests; and therefore the Prophet admonisheth Gods people not to be afraid of them; For they cannot do evil, neither also is it in them to do good.

4. We are to note, that if a Sign or Wonder foretold do come to pass, we have no Warrant to ascribe the bringing of it to pass either to Devil or Witch, for the Lord telleth us this: If there arise among you a Prophet or a Dreamer of dreams, and giveth thee a sign or a wonder. And the sign or the wonder come to pass, whereof he spoke unto thee, saying; Let us go after other Gods (which thou hast not known) and let us serve them: Thou shalt not hearken to the words of that Prophet or that Dreamer of dreams: For the Lord your God proveth you, to know whether you love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul. So that what Divinations or Predictions soever be foretold by any, or what signs or wonders soever be brought to pass, if the persons that work or foretel them, perswade us to serve other Gods, or go to seduce us to Idolatry, we are not to follow them, but are to know that by them the Lord doth prove us, to try if we love him with all our heart, or not. And if there were no other means to distinguish a true Miracle from a false, yet were this infallibly sufficient to instruct and direct us.

5. We may note, that of all the several sorts of Divinations pretended, and of all the acceptations of this Hebrew word in all the Bible, there is nothing that doth imply any such kind of killing Witch, as is commonly imagined, nor none such as make a visible League with the Devil, nor upon whose bodies he sucketh, or hath carnal copulation with them, nor no such as are really changed into Cats, Hares, Wolves, or Dogs; which was the thing we undertook to prove.

3. The next word we are to consider, is [non-Latin script], which Avenarius, Schindlerus, Buxtorsius, and Mr. Goodwin do derive from [non-Latin script] obnubilavit, nubem obduxit, item praestigiis usus est. From whence we may note these things.

1. That the most of all the Translators do some render it by one word, and some by another, that no certainty can be gathered from them at all, as though it did signifie divers and many sorts of these kinds of Augury, Divinations, or juggling Feats, when in reason we cannot but suppose that it only comprehended some one sort, and not so many as the Translators do ascribe to it. The Septuagint render it for the most part [non-Latin script], sometimes [non-Latin script], and sometimes [non-Latin script], which are all of different derivations and significations; some others render it other ways, as, ne q; auspicabimini, ne q; observabitis horas, nevaticinemini, neominemini, nec observet somnia & auguria, nec qui exercet Astrologiam, &c. Now from such a diversity no man is able to draw a positive certainty.

2. They do not keep to one word appropriate to the Hebrew, which if they had not forgotten themselves, they would have done, and not left it uncertain. For Arias Montanus in the 19. of Leviticus, vers. 26. renders it, ne q; praestigiabamini, and in the 2. of Isaiah, vers. 6. translates it, augures sicut Philistim. In Isa. 57. 3. he calleth them Filii Auguratricis. And in the 27. of Jeremiah, v. 9. Et ad Augures vestros. Also Micah 5. 11. he renders it Praestigiatores. Now what great difference there is betwixt any sort of Augury, and Juggling, or Leger-de-main, is known to any of indifferent reading. And the rest of the Translators are far more wild, and more wide. And Junius and Tremellius, who of all others, one might have thought would have been more circumspect, yet fall into the same incertitude; for in Deut. 18. 10. he renders it Planetarius, but in the place before-cited in Leviticus, they render it, ne q; utemini praestigiis, though in the Margent they mend it, with this note, ne q; ex nubibus conjicite, vel ne temporis observationi plus aequo tribuite. And Isa. 2. 6. Et praestigiatores sunt ut Polischtaei.

3. But if there be any certainty in adhering to the primitive signification of the Hebrew root, that plainly intendeth obnubilavit, that it is without question most safe and genuine to translate it Planetarius, to which the most learned Andreas Masius (as he is quoted by Wierus) doth incline in these words: Veteres Hebraeorum dicunt id verbum ad eos propriè pertinere, qui temporum momenta superstitiosè observant, at q; alia fausta rebus gerendis, alia infausta praescribunt. To which agreeth Mr. Thomas Goodwin, saying: But of all I approve those who derive it from [non-Latin script], a Cloud, as if the Original signified properly a Planetary, or Stargazer.

4. But however thus far there is no word found, that signifieth a Witch in the sense we have laid down, nor any such person that hath a real familiar Spirit, either in them, or attending upon them, ready visibly to appear at their beck, this is not yet to be found out.

4. The next is [non-Latin script] from the root [non-Latin script] nichesch, auguratus est, observavit, augurium fecit, which our English Translators have erroneously rendred an Inchanter, which it no way signifieth, nor hath any relation unto, having in the next verse named a Charmer, as though Inchanter and Charmer were not all one, when the word plainly (as Mr. Goodwin and the learned Masius do confess) importeth an Augur or Sooth-sayer: That is, such an one, who out of his own experience draweth observations of good or evil to come: of which we may note these things.

1. The most of all the Translations given us in the Plolyglot, do render the Hebrew word by auguratus est, and so understand it to be an Augur or Sooth-sayer, a Conjecturer, or an Observer, from whatsoever it be that he taketh his observations, as from the flying noise or motion of birds or beasts, looking into their entrails, and the like, and from thence taking upon them to foretel good or evil to come, or what was hidden and secret.

2. The Hebrew word [Hebrew], is by the Septuagint rendred [Hebrew], Augurium, Auspicium, that is, an Augur, an Observer, or a Conjecturer, which Luther translateth: […]yn de vp Uoegell geschrey achte. And in the Low Dutch Bible it is rendred agreeable thereto; and the French render it aux Oiseaux, from the word Oiseau, Avis, Volucris; and the Italians render it Auguropista, which are all to one purpose, and no difference at all, and so the gross mistake of our English Translators is most apparent, that make it to be an Inchanter or Charmer, to which it hath no relation at all.